Oct 18, 2011 at 6:11 pm
The Tax Policy Center’s analysis of candidate Herman Cain’s 9-9-9 plan is out and man, it provides us with an embarrassment of riches in terms of which data to feature.
So let’s stick with the “embarrassment of riches” theme and look at dollars of federal tax change by income class.
The first figure shows that relative to current tax law, average tax payments go up, on average, for the bottom 80% of households, including the bottom fifth (average income, $10,100) by about $1,900, and for the middle fifth (avg inc: about $50,700) by about $4,300. The average tax payment for the top fifth (avg inc: $273,000) falls by about $14,400.
Source: TPC, see link above; changes are relative to current tax policy.
But aggregating things up that way obscures just how extremely regressive 9-9-9 really is. If you break out the top 1% (avg inc: $1.8 million) and the tippy-top 0.1% (avg inc: $7.9 million), that’s where you really see the plan go to work. It reduces the tax burden of the top 1% by $238,000 and that of the top 0.1% by…wait for it…$1.4 freakin’ million!
Souce: TPC, see link above; changes are relative to current tax policy.
–to implement the 9-9-9 plan would truly be the most dramatic and regressive shifting of the tax burden in the history of our nation;
–based on this policy, Herman Cain’s campaign is deeply out of touch with the challenges facing the American middle class;
–the Koch brothers may view these results as showing what smart investors they are, but I think they’ve overreached.
Thank you for joining the conversation. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that: