<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Fiscal Cliff Plan that Walks and Chews Gum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/a-fiscal-cliff-plan-that-walks-and-chews-gum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/a-fiscal-cliff-plan-that-walks-and-chews-gum/</link>
	<description>Facts, Thoughts, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 01:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: davesnyd</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/a-fiscal-cliff-plan-that-walks-and-chews-gum/#comment-248623</link>
		<dc:creator>davesnyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=5901#comment-248623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All due respect-- I think this post is incomplete. I think you need two more graphs:

(1) GDP as a function of time for the three plans

(2) Derivative of GDP as a function of time for the three plans

I suspect what you&#039;ll show is a slower initial increase of the &quot;stimulus&quot; compared to &quot;current policy&quot; but a better long term projection.

Suspect you&#039;ll see negative GDP growth for the &quot;current law&quot;, at least initially.

But your current data does not make the case for stimulus-- it, instead, supports &quot;current law&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All due respect&#8211; I think this post is incomplete. I think you need two more graphs:</p>
<p>(1) GDP as a function of time for the three plans</p>
<p>(2) Derivative of GDP as a function of time for the three plans</p>
<p>I suspect what you&#8217;ll show is a slower initial increase of the &#8220;stimulus&#8221; compared to &#8220;current policy&#8221; but a better long term projection.</p>
<p>Suspect you&#8217;ll see negative GDP growth for the &#8220;current law&#8221;, at least initially.</p>
<p>But your current data does not make the case for stimulus&#8211; it, instead, supports &#8220;current law&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
