Mar 13, 2013 at 10:31 pm
Here’s the exec sum, and note what comes first: job creation! OMG! That’s followed by many ideas we tout here at OTE, including a financial transaction tax, ending tax preferences for investment income, a tax on carbon, spending cuts to defense, some Medicare savings (no benefit cuts), all of which creates jobs in the near term and starts the debt ratio on a downward path by 2015. Again, for all the mishegos about balancing budgets, the economically sensible first order goal is–once the economy is reliably growing–stabilizing and then reducing the debt/GDP ratio.
But wait! This is too liberal, too Keynesian, too revenuey! OK, but the Ryan budget’s too austere, too draconian on the poor, too regressive, too reverse Robin-Hoody. And that’s been front page news. All’s we’re saying is that if legislative plausibility is the litmus test, Ryan’s House budget shouldn’t get one drop of ink (or byte, I guess would be more accurate).
But if it’s smart, timely economics and fiscal policy that form the litmus test…well, then Ryan still doesn’t get a hearing but the CPC budget does.
Thank you for joining the conversation. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that: