<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attention Must Be Paid: The Big (Structural) Jobs Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/attention-must-be-paid-the-big-structural-jobs-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/attention-must-be-paid-the-big-structural-jobs-question/</link>
	<description>Facts, Thoughts, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:25:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed Fasih</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/attention-must-be-paid-the-big-structural-jobs-question/#comment-38802</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed Fasih</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=2725#comment-38802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jared, thanks for the chart. I&#039;d like to reproduce it to study it further and I was just curious what you mean when you &quot;chose peak years to avoid recessionary effects&quot;? Do you mean the edges of your decades were jittered to coincide with recession?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jared, thanks for the chart. I&#8217;d like to reproduce it to study it further and I was just curious what you mean when you &#8220;chose peak years to avoid recessionary effects&#8221;? Do you mean the edges of your decades were jittered to coincide with recession?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perplexed</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/attention-must-be-paid-the-big-structural-jobs-question/#comment-38440</link>
		<dc:creator>perplexed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=2725#comment-38440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The percentage of income going to those with with a low marginal propensity to consume would explain most of it according to Keynes. We need to add this to the chart. If we fail to redistribute the gains, they will concentrate at the top; technologically driven productivity gains just exacerbate the usual effects. If we get redistribution right, we should be able to gain from productivity increases without the drags from wealth and income concentration.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The percentage of income going to those with with a low marginal propensity to consume would explain most of it according to Keynes. We need to add this to the chart. If we fail to redistribute the gains, they will concentrate at the top; technologically driven productivity gains just exacerbate the usual effects. If we get redistribution right, we should be able to gain from productivity increases without the drags from wealth and income concentration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edmundo</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/attention-must-be-paid-the-big-structural-jobs-question/#comment-38413</link>
		<dc:creator>Edmundo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=2725#comment-38413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lump of labor doesn&#039;t look like such a fallacy now ...

Has the bubble of unnecessary work burst?

Put the minimum wage up to a realistic (TCO life supporting) level.

Declare more public holidays.

Then give the unemployed shovels and pay them to make something with real cost and labor saving capital value.  

Or go back to basics and get them to plant trees, clearing out atmospheric carbon and building a store of sustainable energy.

Repeat for each financial crisis until we have so much labor saving that we can all work only for as long as we need to relieve the tedium of leisure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lump of labor doesn&#8217;t look like such a fallacy now &#8230;</p>
<p>Has the bubble of unnecessary work burst?</p>
<p>Put the minimum wage up to a realistic (TCO life supporting) level.</p>
<p>Declare more public holidays.</p>
<p>Then give the unemployed shovels and pay them to make something with real cost and labor saving capital value.  </p>
<p>Or go back to basics and get them to plant trees, clearing out atmospheric carbon and building a store of sustainable energy.</p>
<p>Repeat for each financial crisis until we have so much labor saving that we can all work only for as long as we need to relieve the tedium of leisure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spencer</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/attention-must-be-paid-the-big-structural-jobs-question/#comment-38319</link>
		<dc:creator>spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=2725#comment-38319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On productivity, do a chart of productivity growth as a percent of GDP growth.

prior to 1975 the ratio was about 75%.

In the 1975-95 productivity slowdown it was about 50%.

But since 1995 it has been some 90%.  this means that a one percentage point increase in GDP only generates a 0.1% increase in employment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On productivity, do a chart of productivity growth as a percent of GDP growth.</p>
<p>prior to 1975 the ratio was about 75%.</p>
<p>In the 1975-95 productivity slowdown it was about 50%.</p>
<p>But since 1995 it has been some 90%.  this means that a one percentage point increase in GDP only generates a 0.1% increase in employment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Planet</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/attention-must-be-paid-the-big-structural-jobs-question/#comment-38302</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Planet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=2725#comment-38302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for paying attention. Such growth as we&#039;ve had over the past two decades has owed entirely too much to asset bubbles and financial manipulation. Here are a three more suggestions.

1. Walmartization. Henry Ford is alleged to have paid his employees well so they could afford to buy cars. The Waltons pay their employees a pittance so they can afford to shop nowhere but Walmart. This is not a limited phenomenon in America. Minimum wage — no benefits — dollar stores — becoming the norm.

2. Productivity capture. Futurists in the late 60s and 70s predicted that productivity gains would lead to a 21st Century America beleaguered by an excess of leisure time and distributed wealth. They were right about the productivity gains, wrong about who would benefit. Productivity gains have been captured by the very wealthy, while working Americans work longer hours for lower wages. One might want to consider this when thinking about the structural causes of decreased demand, lackluster job growth.

3. Off-shoring. Production is sent overseas. Profits are sent overseas as investment in production overseas. 

Where&#039;s the demand, where are the jobs? Well, as the result of private and public decisions made over several decades, the American economy is being gutted, jobs sent overseas, wages driven down, returns pipelined to the top. This big structural jobs question doesn&#039;t look all that mysterious from down here in the trenches.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for paying attention. Such growth as we&#8217;ve had over the past two decades has owed entirely too much to asset bubbles and financial manipulation. Here are a three more suggestions.</p>
<p>1. Walmartization. Henry Ford is alleged to have paid his employees well so they could afford to buy cars. The Waltons pay their employees a pittance so they can afford to shop nowhere but Walmart. This is not a limited phenomenon in America. Minimum wage — no benefits — dollar stores — becoming the norm.</p>
<p>2. Productivity capture. Futurists in the late 60s and 70s predicted that productivity gains would lead to a 21st Century America beleaguered by an excess of leisure time and distributed wealth. They were right about the productivity gains, wrong about who would benefit. Productivity gains have been captured by the very wealthy, while working Americans work longer hours for lower wages. One might want to consider this when thinking about the structural causes of decreased demand, lackluster job growth.</p>
<p>3. Off-shoring. Production is sent overseas. Profits are sent overseas as investment in production overseas. </p>
<p>Where&#8217;s the demand, where are the jobs? Well, as the result of private and public decisions made over several decades, the American economy is being gutted, jobs sent overseas, wages driven down, returns pipelined to the top. This big structural jobs question doesn&#8217;t look all that mysterious from down here in the trenches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sydb</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/attention-must-be-paid-the-big-structural-jobs-question/#comment-38283</link>
		<dc:creator>sydb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=2725#comment-38283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[are you going to take a stab at explaining what is going on or wait until you hear from others?  And who do you think has the forward for correction? The Third Way think tank or the more old school liberal school place? Since on the center-left that is where we are in terms of suggestions in the blogosphere. Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you going to take a stab at explaining what is going on or wait until you hear from others?  And who do you think has the forward for correction? The Third Way think tank or the more old school liberal school place? Since on the center-left that is where we are in terms of suggestions in the blogosphere. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rootless_e</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/attention-must-be-paid-the-big-structural-jobs-question/#comment-38279</link>
		<dc:creator>rootless_e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=2725#comment-38279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allocative inefficiency is a self-reinforcing black hole. The whole basis of PE investment strategies for &quot;unlocking&quot; value in corporations is that cash on hand is better than long term revenue - and I don&#039;t see how any economy can survive that kind of looter mentality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allocative inefficiency is a self-reinforcing black hole. The whole basis of PE investment strategies for &#8220;unlocking&#8221; value in corporations is that cash on hand is better than long term revenue &#8211; and I don&#8217;t see how any economy can survive that kind of looter mentality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
