<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Capital Reserves: They&#8217;re Key to Financial Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/capital-reserves-theyre-key-to-financial-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/capital-reserves-theyre-key-to-financial-reform/</link>
	<description>Facts, Thoughts, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 01:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: perplexed</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/capital-reserves-theyre-key-to-financial-reform/#comment-35343</link>
		<dc:creator>perplexed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=2632#comment-35343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How is it that these business are allowed to operate without providing insurance to protect the public from the damage they cause? You can&#039;t even fill potholes in most places in the Country without purchasing adequate coverage for the damage your business might inflict on others. 

If the public is going to continue to provide insurance to these private business we need to charge appropriate premiums for the risk we&#039;re taking on and demand full disclosure of any activities that expose us to risk so we can establish the correct premium. Without free public insurance, these TBTF institutions will disappear due to the &quot;natural market forces&quot; they so claim to love when the benefits accrue to them. We can no longer afford to provide this subsidy; as if we ever could.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it that these business are allowed to operate without providing insurance to protect the public from the damage they cause? You can&#8217;t even fill potholes in most places in the Country without purchasing adequate coverage for the damage your business might inflict on others. </p>
<p>If the public is going to continue to provide insurance to these private business we need to charge appropriate premiums for the risk we&#8217;re taking on and demand full disclosure of any activities that expose us to risk so we can establish the correct premium. Without free public insurance, these TBTF institutions will disappear due to the &#8220;natural market forces&#8221; they so claim to love when the benefits accrue to them. We can no longer afford to provide this subsidy; as if we ever could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: comma1</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/capital-reserves-theyre-key-to-financial-reform/#comment-35174</link>
		<dc:creator>comma1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=2632#comment-35174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although in banker-land this may be a perfectly responsible and reasonable comment: &quot;You can get a lot of the other stuff wrong, but with a strong capital requirement rule, you’ve built in a backstop against overleveraging.&quot;  In America, and actually, throughout the rest of the globe (as we have already seen) too big to fail is too big, capital reserves or not.

This is like saying if we continue to perform surgery in the bathroom at the Vince Lombardi rest stop (NJ) then we should wash our hands before the first incision.  The issue isn&#039;t washing of hands, the issue is performing surgery in a truck stop restroom.  These banks are too big to fail, they know it, Wall St knows it, the president knows it, and the people know it.  They need to be broken and split or taken over.  It is shocking that this administration failed to rectify it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although in banker-land this may be a perfectly responsible and reasonable comment: &#8220;You can get a lot of the other stuff wrong, but with a strong capital requirement rule, you’ve built in a backstop against overleveraging.&#8221;  In America, and actually, throughout the rest of the globe (as we have already seen) too big to fail is too big, capital reserves or not.</p>
<p>This is like saying if we continue to perform surgery in the bathroom at the Vince Lombardi rest stop (NJ) then we should wash our hands before the first incision.  The issue isn&#8217;t washing of hands, the issue is performing surgery in a truck stop restroom.  These banks are too big to fail, they know it, Wall St knows it, the president knows it, and the people know it.  They need to be broken and split or taken over.  It is shocking that this administration failed to rectify it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Bernstein</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/capital-reserves-theyre-key-to-financial-reform/#comment-35128</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Bernstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=2632#comment-35128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fair point, but bank reserves are not in the &quot;low&quot; measures of liquidity, as I recall, like M1--though they would be in the higher ones.  More importantly, I don&#039;t believe there is a negative correlation between bank reserves in the range of Dodd/Frank and money supply (not so much boosting reverse requirements &quot;dramatically&quot; as much as dialing them back to historical ranges).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair point, but bank reserves are not in the &#8220;low&#8221; measures of liquidity, as I recall, like M1&#8211;though they would be in the higher ones.  More importantly, I don&#8217;t believe there is a negative correlation between bank reserves in the range of Dodd/Frank and money supply (not so much boosting reverse requirements &#8220;dramatically&#8221; as much as dialing them back to historical ranges).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davesnyd</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/capital-reserves-theyre-key-to-financial-reform/#comment-35095</link>
		<dc:creator>davesnyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=2632#comment-35095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Help me, please-- it has been a long time since freshman economics. Doesn&#039;t  the reserve ratio affect the money supply in an inverse relationship? So boosting it dramatically should decrease the money supply and cause a deflationary period? Won&#039;t that be problematic right now? Won&#039;t that require a pumping of cash into the system-- which to some degree would help us print our way out of debt?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help me, please&#8211; it has been a long time since freshman economics. Doesn&#8217;t  the reserve ratio affect the money supply in an inverse relationship? So boosting it dramatically should decrease the money supply and cause a deflationary period? Won&#8217;t that be problematic right now? Won&#8217;t that require a pumping of cash into the system&#8211; which to some degree would help us print our way out of debt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
