<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It All Comes Down to Cases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/it-all-comes-down-to-cases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/it-all-comes-down-to-cases/</link>
	<description>Facts, Thoughts, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: readerOfTeaLeaves</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/it-all-comes-down-to-cases/#comment-71948</link>
		<dc:creator>readerOfTeaLeaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=3268#comment-71948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of greatest interest to me were Reich&#039;s points:
(1) the &#039;big government&#039; meme is a canard, 
(2) **who** should government be working for?  

George Will invoked Reagan and Jefferson.  But what did Jefferson ever tell us about global finance, offshoring, or tax havens that might be practical advice today...?  

The other point that bears mention in a blog comment was the question from the evangelical minister, who raised the topic of economic inequality -- which is partly a function of tax policy.

Surprisingly, the evangelical minister synched with Robert Reich&#039;s points -- not with the points made on behalf of the GOP.  (Ryan&#039;s plea to &#039;get out of this class division rhetoric&#039; was droll. Was he suggesting that evangelical ministers should never raise the specter of income inequality...?)

Prior to watching the video, I&#039;d landed on two blogs today that each linked to a  Bureau of Investigative Journalism&#039;s report about an estimated 600 million euros that UK banks have cheated EU governments out of -- via tax havens and financial &#039;services&#039; based in the City of London and affiliated tax secrecy jurisdictions.

It&#039;s worth noting that the Church of England is raising questions about the income inequality in the UK, so I don&#039;t think it&#039;s just the US evangelicals who are starting to ask tougher questions about economic, finance, and tax structures.  

In other words, &#039;taxation&#039; and finance appear to be percolating closer to the center of public conversation, and the evangelical minister&#039;s questions alluded to both of those topics.

At this historical moment, against the background  of the economic, social, and financial news we are seeing, Reich&#039;s (and the evangelical minister&#039;s) questions appear to be more resonant with each passing news story -- including the one about how Ryan&#039;s House GOP group has once again done a turnabout at the 58th minute of the 11th hour.

My takeaway: that evangelical minister gave me hope.
People do care.
We are paying attention.  And starting to ask a lot more questions.
There&#039;s the upside.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of greatest interest to me were Reich&#8217;s points:<br />
(1) the &#8216;big government&#8217; meme is a canard,<br />
(2) **who** should government be working for?  </p>
<p>George Will invoked Reagan and Jefferson.  But what did Jefferson ever tell us about global finance, offshoring, or tax havens that might be practical advice today&#8230;?  </p>
<p>The other point that bears mention in a blog comment was the question from the evangelical minister, who raised the topic of economic inequality &#8212; which is partly a function of tax policy.</p>
<p>Surprisingly, the evangelical minister synched with Robert Reich&#8217;s points &#8212; not with the points made on behalf of the GOP.  (Ryan&#8217;s plea to &#8216;get out of this class division rhetoric&#8217; was droll. Was he suggesting that evangelical ministers should never raise the specter of income inequality&#8230;?)</p>
<p>Prior to watching the video, I&#8217;d landed on two blogs today that each linked to a  Bureau of Investigative Journalism&#8217;s report about an estimated 600 million euros that UK banks have cheated EU governments out of &#8212; via tax havens and financial &#8216;services&#8217; based in the City of London and affiliated tax secrecy jurisdictions.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth noting that the Church of England is raising questions about the income inequality in the UK, so I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s just the US evangelicals who are starting to ask tougher questions about economic, finance, and tax structures.  </p>
<p>In other words, &#8216;taxation&#8217; and finance appear to be percolating closer to the center of public conversation, and the evangelical minister&#8217;s questions alluded to both of those topics.</p>
<p>At this historical moment, against the background  of the economic, social, and financial news we are seeing, Reich&#8217;s (and the evangelical minister&#8217;s) questions appear to be more resonant with each passing news story &#8212; including the one about how Ryan&#8217;s House GOP group has once again done a turnabout at the 58th minute of the 11th hour.</p>
<p>My takeaway: that evangelical minister gave me hope.<br />
People do care.<br />
We are paying attention.  And starting to ask a lot more questions.<br />
There&#8217;s the upside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the buckaroo</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/it-all-comes-down-to-cases/#comment-71920</link>
		<dc:creator>the buckaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 21:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=3268#comment-71920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...seems the difference between the two agendas of big government boils down to the Conservative Brotherhood&#039;s need to peer into our bedrooms &amp; not into the boardrooms...the Libs maintain the opposite is govs role.

Think there is a Barney &amp; Friends Show coming to the local Faux Newscorp outlet?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;seems the difference between the two agendas of big government boils down to the Conservative Brotherhood&#8217;s need to peer into our bedrooms &amp; not into the boardrooms&#8230;the Libs maintain the opposite is govs role.</p>
<p>Think there is a Barney &amp; Friends Show coming to the local Faux Newscorp outlet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob weber</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/it-all-comes-down-to-cases/#comment-71824</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=3268#comment-71824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The program was excellent. There needs to be more debate and discussion like this rather than just talking points and superficial questions without follow up that is the usual.  I turned David Gregory off last week as he allowed his guest to blather on without requiring some foundation and basis of fact in the response to his question.  I find Up with Chris Hays and GPS to be shows with actual discussion from knowledgeable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The program was excellent. There needs to be more debate and discussion like this rather than just talking points and superficial questions without follow up that is the usual.  I turned David Gregory off last week as he allowed his guest to blather on without requiring some foundation and basis of fact in the response to his question.  I find Up with Chris Hays and GPS to be shows with actual discussion from knowledgeable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
