<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: J’Accuse!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/j%E2%80%99accuse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/j%e2%80%99accuse/</link>
	<description>Facts, Thoughts, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:46:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Th</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/j%e2%80%99accuse/#comment-162282</link>
		<dc:creator>Th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 20:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=4972#comment-162282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I disagree that Obama shouldn&#039;t be given credit for falling gas prices. He threatened to release oil from the strategic reserve and started investigating futures trading in oil with potential new restrictions. I say both contributed to price decreases.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree that Obama shouldn&#8217;t be given credit for falling gas prices. He threatened to release oil from the strategic reserve and started investigating futures trading in oil with potential new restrictions. I say both contributed to price decreases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/j%e2%80%99accuse/#comment-161427</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 05:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=4972#comment-161427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder who owns those channels.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder who owns those channels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perplexed</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/j%e2%80%99accuse/#comment-161394</link>
		<dc:creator>perplexed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 04:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=4972#comment-161394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[-&quot;I accuse TV news of asymmetry!&quot;

Asymmetry may be the least of it&#039;s crimes. Bill Moyers&#039; show the other day featured an excellent interview with Marty Kaplan from USC&#039;s Norman Lear Center that should stand as warning to all concerned about the plight of democracy in this entertainment age. We are trying to operate a democracy in the absence of being informed by a free and independent press so critical to its success. The kind of press needed to serve a democracy is nothing like the kind needed to raise profits for shareholders and advertisers. Neil Postman warned of this many years ago in his book &quot;Amusing Ourselves to Death;&quot; Kaplan does a superb job of describing just how it works and how dangerous it is. The show is called &quot;Big Money, Big Media, Big Trouble&quot; and can be seen here:  http://billmoyers.com/episode/full-show-big-money-big-media-big-trouble/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-&#8221;I accuse TV news of asymmetry!&#8221;</p>
<p>Asymmetry may be the least of it&#8217;s crimes. Bill Moyers&#8217; show the other day featured an excellent interview with Marty Kaplan from USC&#8217;s Norman Lear Center that should stand as warning to all concerned about the plight of democracy in this entertainment age. We are trying to operate a democracy in the absence of being informed by a free and independent press so critical to its success. The kind of press needed to serve a democracy is nothing like the kind needed to raise profits for shareholders and advertisers. Neil Postman warned of this many years ago in his book &#8220;Amusing Ourselves to Death;&#8221; Kaplan does a superb job of describing just how it works and how dangerous it is. The show is called &#8220;Big Money, Big Media, Big Trouble&#8221; and can be seen here:  <a href="http://billmoyers.com/episode/full-show-big-money-big-media-big-trouble/" rel="nofollow">http://billmoyers.com/episode/full-show-big-money-big-media-big-trouble/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Lewis</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/j%e2%80%99accuse/#comment-161193</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=4972#comment-161193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the U.S. doesn&#039;t control enough of the oil supply to make a difference, I think we may control enough of the demand. If we cut our consumption by, say, 15%, it would almost surely push prices down. As Amory Lovins never tires of saying, that would be relatively easy to do (at least from a technological if not a political standpoint). 

I&#039;m reminded of a column Steve Forbes published in his magazine early in the Clinton administration. He argued that increasing CAFE fuel economy standards would actually lead to an increase in gas consumption, because people would drive more. Yes, he actually said that. I immediately wrote to congratulate him on, perhaps without realizing it, solving the fuel crisis. Clearly, what the government needs to do is mandate WORSE fuel economy in our vehicles. Then people will drive less and we&#039;ll save oodles of gas. Problem solved!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the U.S. doesn&#8217;t control enough of the oil supply to make a difference, I think we may control enough of the demand. If we cut our consumption by, say, 15%, it would almost surely push prices down. As Amory Lovins never tires of saying, that would be relatively easy to do (at least from a technological if not a political standpoint). </p>
<p>I&#8217;m reminded of a column Steve Forbes published in his magazine early in the Clinton administration. He argued that increasing CAFE fuel economy standards would actually lead to an increase in gas consumption, because people would drive more. Yes, he actually said that. I immediately wrote to congratulate him on, perhaps without realizing it, solving the fuel crisis. Clearly, what the government needs to do is mandate WORSE fuel economy in our vehicles. Then people will drive less and we&#8217;ll save oodles of gas. Problem solved!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/j%e2%80%99accuse/#comment-161109</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=4972#comment-161109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think, all these years, we&#039;ve been getting the saying &quot;no news is good news&quot; backwards... media conventions would lead me to believe the correct turn of phrase is &quot;good news is not news.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, all these years, we&#8217;ve been getting the saying &#8220;no news is good news&#8221; backwards&#8230; media conventions would lead me to believe the correct turn of phrase is &#8220;good news is not news.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
