<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: May Jobs Report: First Impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/may-jobs-report-first-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/may-jobs-report-first-impressions/</link>
	<description>Facts, Thoughts, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:46:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Bernstein</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/may-jobs-report-first-impressions/#comment-187699</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Bernstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 00:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=5310#comment-187699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe that month was inflated by workers hired to take the decennial Census.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that month was inflated by workers hired to take the decennial Census.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjs</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/may-jobs-report-first-impressions/#comment-187474</link>
		<dc:creator>rjs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 19:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=5310#comment-187474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this is off the wall; looking at your chart, i notice over 500K jobs added in may 2010 - if i recall, the severe job losses were over in early 2009, hence may of that year was better too...

could the seasonal adjustments skew subsequent Mays? i believe they take the last 5 years into account...

NB: unadjusted job gains were nearly 800K: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t17.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is off the wall; looking at your chart, i notice over 500K jobs added in may 2010 &#8211; if i recall, the severe job losses were over in early 2009, hence may of that year was better too&#8230;</p>
<p>could the seasonal adjustments skew subsequent Mays? i believe they take the last 5 years into account&#8230;</p>
<p>NB: unadjusted job gains were nearly 800K: <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t17.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t17.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralf</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/may-jobs-report-first-impressions/#comment-187319</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 16:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=5310#comment-187319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How would employment look if mass layoffs of teachers, state and federal workers hadn&#039;t been the order of the day from the deficit panic crowd.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would employment look if mass layoffs of teachers, state and federal workers hadn&#8217;t been the order of the day from the deficit panic crowd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rima Regas</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/may-jobs-report-first-impressions/#comment-186696</link>
		<dc:creator>Rima Regas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 02:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=5310#comment-186696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s not forget that the 99ers are now losing their unemployment benefits, as per Congressional limits from this winter. For those who&#039;ve been out of a job since 08 there are no words can describe how much of an insult to injury this is going to be.

I don&#039;t see you on Google+. You should try it. Lots of interest in economics... :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not forget that the 99ers are now losing their unemployment benefits, as per Congressional limits from this winter. For those who&#8217;ve been out of a job since 08 there are no words can describe how much of an insult to injury this is going to be.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see you on Google+. You should try it. Lots of interest in economics&#8230; <img src='http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Donaldson</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/may-jobs-report-first-impressions/#comment-186348</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Donaldson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=5310#comment-186348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We need to lower taxes for the job-creators. Every new mansion they build for their fun, means more bathrooms and thus more opportunity for janitorial jobs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need to lower taxes for the job-creators. Every new mansion they build for their fun, means more bathrooms and thus more opportunity for janitorial jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
