Comments on: Presidential Debate #3: Foreign Policy http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/presidential-debate-3-foreign-policy/ Facts, Thoughts, and Commentary Thu, 23 May 2013 04:31:49 +0000 hourly 1 By: PeonInChief http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/presidential-debate-3-foreign-policy/#comment-323197 PeonInChief Wed, 24 Oct 2012 03:37:53 +0000 http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=6828#comment-323197 It’s unfortunate that neither was forced to talk about the drone attacks–the ones that allegedly have taken out the terrorists–yeah, terrorist wedding parties, funerals and the like. It’s estimated that 98% of the people killed were “collateral damage.”

]]> By: John http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/presidential-debate-3-foreign-policy/#comment-323116 John Wed, 24 Oct 2012 00:47:32 +0000 http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=6828#comment-323116 Would someone care to explain how the “commander-in-chief” would be considered to have the kind of edge that (say) the President wouldn’t have? Or how the President would have that kind of edge because he is “commander-in-chief”?

The title “commander-in-chief” should be expressed as “Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces,” and is under the US Constitution the President. In other words, he has absolutely no edge in understanding or analyzing anything that the President himself wouldn’t have.

]]>