<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PUH_LEASE! Nonsensical Tax Attacks Re SCOTUS ACA Decision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/puh_lease-nonsensical-tax-attacks-re-scotus-aca-decision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/puh_lease-nonsensical-tax-attacks-re-scotus-aca-decision/</link>
	<description>Facts, Thoughts, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 22:59:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Misaki</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/puh_lease-nonsensical-tax-attacks-re-scotus-aca-decision/#comment-227727</link>
		<dc:creator>Misaki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 18:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=5626#comment-227727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;If you don’t have insurance and you get treatment for your illness, that’s uncompensated care, which I’ll pay for. 

Hospitals will generally bill the recipient of the health care. When the costs cannot be recovered, then yes, states do pay some of the costs for things like unpaid emergency room bills.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;If you don’t have insurance and you get treatment for your illness, that’s uncompensated care, which I’ll pay for. </p>
<p>Hospitals will generally bill the recipient of the health care. When the costs cannot be recovered, then yes, states do pay some of the costs for things like unpaid emergency room bills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: save_the_rustbelt</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/puh_lease-nonsensical-tax-attacks-re-scotus-aca-decision/#comment-217954</link>
		<dc:creator>save_the_rustbelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=5626#comment-217954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PPACA will fail because it is too complicated and convoluted to implement in any orderly manner.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PPACA will fail because it is too complicated and convoluted to implement in any orderly manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Levit</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/puh_lease-nonsensical-tax-attacks-re-scotus-aca-decision/#comment-217934</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Levit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=5626#comment-217934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The payments are not taxes, in my opinion.
Social Security passed constitutional muster, primarily because the payments were deemed taxes, for the general welfare.
The money went into the Treasury&#039;s general fund, like all other taxes.
And, no citizen could tie his benefits to his specific contributions, thus a tax for the &quot;general welfare.&quot;
Here, the &quot;taxes&quot; may go to the Treasury&#039;s general fund, but that is merely a convenient conduit to provide the subsidies to the for-profit insurers for their expensive health insurance.
Yes, the citizens can then but health insurance, but the first beneficiary is the for-profit insurers.  Their direct cut from the &quot;taxes&quot; would never have materialized except for the &quot;taxes.&quot;
Don Levit]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The payments are not taxes, in my opinion.<br />
Social Security passed constitutional muster, primarily because the payments were deemed taxes, for the general welfare.<br />
The money went into the Treasury&#8217;s general fund, like all other taxes.<br />
And, no citizen could tie his benefits to his specific contributions, thus a tax for the &#8220;general welfare.&#8221;<br />
Here, the &#8220;taxes&#8221; may go to the Treasury&#8217;s general fund, but that is merely a convenient conduit to provide the subsidies to the for-profit insurers for their expensive health insurance.<br />
Yes, the citizens can then but health insurance, but the first beneficiary is the for-profit insurers.  Their direct cut from the &#8220;taxes&#8221; would never have materialized except for the &#8220;taxes.&#8221;<br />
Don Levit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellis</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/puh_lease-nonsensical-tax-attacks-re-scotus-aca-decision/#comment-217692</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=5626#comment-217692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess the health insurance companies wrote a fantastic bill. Yes, the two presidential candidates each pushed through similar laws to profit the medical industrial complex. That makes Obama and Romney twins. Oh, and by the way, just because you pay for insurance, you are not guaranteed actual medical care. That&#039;s the beauty of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the health insurance companies wrote a fantastic bill. Yes, the two presidential candidates each pushed through similar laws to profit the medical industrial complex. That makes Obama and Romney twins. Oh, and by the way, just because you pay for insurance, you are not guaranteed actual medical care. That&#8217;s the beauty of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Bernstein</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/puh_lease-nonsensical-tax-attacks-re-scotus-aca-decision/#comment-217644</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Bernstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=5626#comment-217644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good for the reporter for being informed!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for the reporter for being informed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: progrowth liberal</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/puh_lease-nonsensical-tax-attacks-re-scotus-aca-decision/#comment-217610</link>
		<dc:creator>progrowth liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=5626#comment-217610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update as I listen to the CBS Morning Show.  Romney claims this is  $500 billion tax increase, which got Sarah Palin rolling as she changed the claim to a $1 trillion tax increase.  CBS reporter comes back telling us how many millions of Americans will pay the penalty - 4 million.  In other words, 1.3% of the population ... like you said!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update as I listen to the CBS Morning Show.  Romney claims this is  $500 billion tax increase, which got Sarah Palin rolling as she changed the claim to a $1 trillion tax increase.  CBS reporter comes back telling us how many millions of Americans will pay the penalty &#8211; 4 million.  In other words, 1.3% of the population &#8230; like you said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: progrowth liberal</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/puh_lease-nonsensical-tax-attacks-re-scotus-aca-decision/#comment-217600</link>
		<dc:creator>progrowth liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=5626#comment-217600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jared - thanks for this very well done rebuttal!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jared &#8211; thanks for this very well done rebuttal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davesnyd</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/puh_lease-nonsensical-tax-attacks-re-scotus-aca-decision/#comment-216974</link>
		<dc:creator>davesnyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=5626#comment-216974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But I thought Republicans liked to increase taxes on people below the top 20% brackets?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I thought Republicans liked to increase taxes on people below the top 20% brackets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
