<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Read These Articles!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/read-these-articles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/read-these-articles/</link>
	<description>Facts, Thoughts, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:46:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Foster Boondoggle</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/read-these-articles/#comment-53738</link>
		<dc:creator>Foster Boondoggle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=3002#comment-53738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;[B]eware of perennial conservative arguments that tack the word “jobs” on the end.&quot;

I&#039;ve come up with a guide to understanding &quot;job-killing regulations&quot; arguments. Imagine a society where armed robbery is legal, so anyone who can afford it hires bodyguards for protection - and of course others make their livings as armed robbers. Then a law is proposed to make armed robbery illegal. Now see if you could substitute this proposal for whatever regulation is being used as the job-killer du jour. Instead of &quot;this new law will destroy the jobs of coal miners and steam boiler makers&quot; you&#039;ve got &quot;this new law will destroy the jobs of bodyguards and armed robbers&quot;. I find it clarifies the issue. 

* Pollution from coal burning: check.
* Clean water laws: check.
* Dodd-Frank: check.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;[B]eware of perennial conservative arguments that tack the word “jobs” on the end.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve come up with a guide to understanding &#8220;job-killing regulations&#8221; arguments. Imagine a society where armed robbery is legal, so anyone who can afford it hires bodyguards for protection &#8211; and of course others make their livings as armed robbers. Then a law is proposed to make armed robbery illegal. Now see if you could substitute this proposal for whatever regulation is being used as the job-killer du jour. Instead of &#8220;this new law will destroy the jobs of coal miners and steam boiler makers&#8221; you&#8217;ve got &#8220;this new law will destroy the jobs of bodyguards and armed robbers&#8221;. I find it clarifies the issue. </p>
<p>* Pollution from coal burning: check.<br />
* Clean water laws: check.<br />
* Dodd-Frank: check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: save_the_rustbelt</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/read-these-articles/#comment-53529</link>
		<dc:creator>save_the_rustbelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=3002#comment-53529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Government regulators often lack some important characteristics:

1. any modicum of common sense

2. any sense of cost-benefit

3. consistency in their own interpretations and enforcement actions


And then there is the hidden agenda, most regulatory law is (intentionally) a welfare program for lawyers, who of course dominate Congress.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Government regulators often lack some important characteristics:</p>
<p>1. any modicum of common sense</p>
<p>2. any sense of cost-benefit</p>
<p>3. consistency in their own interpretations and enforcement actions</p>
<p>And then there is the hidden agenda, most regulatory law is (intentionally) a welfare program for lawyers, who of course dominate Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/read-these-articles/#comment-53326</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=3002#comment-53326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jared,

Remember Rahm Emmanuel&#039;s line - &quot;never waste a crisis.&quot;

Don&#039;t you think the business lobby has just this thing in mind.  It&#039;s obvious that a lack of demand is the biggest hindrance to small business, but convincing enough politicians that it&#039;s regulations will get them some friendly legislation.

Even democrats like Harold Ford Jr buy into this stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jared,</p>
<p>Remember Rahm Emmanuel&#8217;s line &#8211; &#8220;never waste a crisis.&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you think the business lobby has just this thing in mind.  It&#8217;s obvious that a lack of demand is the biggest hindrance to small business, but convincing enough politicians that it&#8217;s regulations will get them some friendly legislation.</p>
<p>Even democrats like Harold Ford Jr buy into this stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
