<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unemployment Doesn’t Just Hurt the Unemployed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/unemployment-doesnt-just-hurt-the-unemployed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/unemployment-doesnt-just-hurt-the-unemployed/</link>
	<description>Facts, Thoughts, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:28:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome Barry</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/unemployment-doesnt-just-hurt-the-unemployed/#comment-317738</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=6759#comment-317738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Dr. Bernstein.

Oh, dear.  Once more the academic goes into the breach to provide cover for the further Keynsian priming of the pump.

That won&#039;t work.  The baby boom started retiring.  Already and for the next 20 years the most productive members of the workforce will attrit from making positive GDP effort to being dependent.  The 47% will grow to 75%. 

Whether I endorse or oppose deficit spending doesn&#039;t matter to me or you.  What matters is that the population bulge of the baby boom is irreversibly moving productivity to dependency.

True &quot;change&quot; won&#039;t happen until the taxpayers resent and outnumber and outvote the dependents.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Dr. Bernstein.</p>
<p>Oh, dear.  Once more the academic goes into the breach to provide cover for the further Keynsian priming of the pump.</p>
<p>That won&#8217;t work.  The baby boom started retiring.  Already and for the next 20 years the most productive members of the workforce will attrit from making positive GDP effort to being dependent.  The 47% will grow to 75%. </p>
<p>Whether I endorse or oppose deficit spending doesn&#8217;t matter to me or you.  What matters is that the population bulge of the baby boom is irreversibly moving productivity to dependency.</p>
<p>True &#8220;change&#8221; won&#8217;t happen until the taxpayers resent and outnumber and outvote the dependents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahmoud El-Darwish</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/unemployment-doesnt-just-hurt-the-unemployed/#comment-317151</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahmoud El-Darwish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=6759#comment-317151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unemployment Doesn’t Just Hurt the Unemployed
---Jared Bernstein’s

In truth, an unemployment rate of around 20% is about right for an industrialized 21st Century nation. There is no such thing as a &#039;High&#039; or &#039;Low&#039; unemployment rate.Technology and disinter-mediation will actually lead to a demand adjusted employment rate of around 75% by 2020.
Indeed, as the author pointed out, the downwards bearing market pressure on wages is a reflection of a paradigm shift in the value of human workers in a New Millennium.This is a reality that the US, for example, fails to confront.
The solution is serious population reduction. This ugly reality eludes all industrialized nations except for China and Japan perhaps.
The Western nations such as the UK, USA and Western Europe only have population as a tool to keep unemployment manageable, since manufacturing is all but irretrievable, farming has been outsourced, and the US&#039;s &#039;human capital&#039; advantage in technology and education has slipped away.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unemployment Doesn’t Just Hurt the Unemployed<br />
&#8212;Jared Bernstein’s</p>
<p>In truth, an unemployment rate of around 20% is about right for an industrialized 21st Century nation. There is no such thing as a &#8216;High&#8217; or &#8216;Low&#8217; unemployment rate.Technology and disinter-mediation will actually lead to a demand adjusted employment rate of around 75% by 2020.<br />
Indeed, as the author pointed out, the downwards bearing market pressure on wages is a reflection of a paradigm shift in the value of human workers in a New Millennium.This is a reality that the US, for example, fails to confront.<br />
The solution is serious population reduction. This ugly reality eludes all industrialized nations except for China and Japan perhaps.<br />
The Western nations such as the UK, USA and Western Europe only have population as a tool to keep unemployment manageable, since manufacturing is all but irretrievable, farming has been outsourced, and the US&#8217;s &#8216;human capital&#8217; advantage in technology and education has slipped away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noni Mausa</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/unemployment-doesnt-just-hurt-the-unemployed/#comment-316992</link>
		<dc:creator>Noni Mausa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 02:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=6759#comment-316992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In addition to the depressing effect on the labour market, higher unemployment means that the support for those unemployed people falls on the shoulders of the employed, whether directly (adult children, spouses or friends supported by people who care) or indirectly through taxes paid for social services, medicare, and prisons.

So not only do the surviving workers still have to work to support themselves and create value for the business owners, but their depressed wages are further stretched to cover others.  The still-employed people are less able to build equity, save for the future or cover current costs -- unless they jettison their friends and relatives, and that doesn&#039;t effect the social and taxation burden.  Every person unemployed reduces the effective income of the employed, so 100 lost jobs can equal 200 or more hits to collective prosperity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to the depressing effect on the labour market, higher unemployment means that the support for those unemployed people falls on the shoulders of the employed, whether directly (adult children, spouses or friends supported by people who care) or indirectly through taxes paid for social services, medicare, and prisons.</p>
<p>So not only do the surviving workers still have to work to support themselves and create value for the business owners, but their depressed wages are further stretched to cover others.  The still-employed people are less able to build equity, save for the future or cover current costs &#8212; unless they jettison their friends and relatives, and that doesn&#8217;t effect the social and taxation burden.  Every person unemployed reduces the effective income of the employed, so 100 lost jobs can equal 200 or more hits to collective prosperity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rima Regas</title>
		<link>http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/unemployment-doesnt-just-hurt-the-unemployed/#comment-316386</link>
		<dc:creator>Rima Regas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/?p=6759#comment-316386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d love to see pieces on the effects of long-term unemployment and unemployment among African Americans. What are the long-term prospects? What do you think should be proposed in a new Congress to help these two populations? Many are starting to lose their benefits. What will they do? What can government do, assuming Dems regain the lower House.

Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see pieces on the effects of long-term unemployment and unemployment among African Americans. What are the long-term prospects? What do you think should be proposed in a new Congress to help these two populations? Many are starting to lose their benefits. What will they do? What can government do, assuming Dems regain the lower House.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
