There are interesting, challenging, and portentous political economy issues in play right now, and unless you’re taking a well-deserved post-election vacation from such matters, they’re worth your attention.
For example, there’s the question of the whether the upper-income Bush tax cuts will finally sunset. This was a clear platform of the President’s campaign…in fact, it may have been the policy point he hit the hardest and most consistently. And significant shares of voters agree (about half support the upper-income expirations, and even more recognize the need for more revenue).
Republicans and their proxies, however, argue that the fact that they held the House was America’s way of saying they don’t want to see any tax increases. This is wrong, based on not just the above poll results but many other polls that preceded the vote, not to mention the fact that Tuesday’s results decidedly favored Dems. But it’s predictable. The R’s, virtually all of whom have pledged away tax policy to Grover Norquist, would make this argument no matter what the outcome was.
Earlier today we had a good conversation over at MSNBC with Martin Bashir on these matters. Like I say at the end of the segment, I keep running into this Republicans argument: “Ok, you won…now here are our demands.”
That’s some serious chutzpah. Of course, I understand and support the need for compromise. As the President emphasized in his victory speech, if we can work together we can solve this thing. But remember, we’ve already cut $1.5 trillion in spending over the next decade. Majorities rejected the Romney/Ryan/Norquist position, recognizing that a) there’s an important role for an amply funded federal government, and b) we can’t get there on spending cuts alone.
Sure, we’re a closely divided country. But the more I pour through election results, the more I think there’s a lot of people out there who understand the economic dynamics and needs of the country a lot better than House R’s. So stick to your plan, Mr. President, and let’s see what unfolds.