President Obama’s New Anti-Deportation Plan

June 15th, 2012 at 1:38 pm

I was going to summarize this new move by the Pres as being in that all-too-rare intersection of good policy and good politics, but Harold Meyerson beat me to it!  He focuses more on the politics but here’s why I like the policy.

Key to immigration reform is controlling inflows from the border.  History shows that comprehensive reform is impossible without that, and how to do that is a big, open question.  But this move today has little to do with that.  This is about providing temporary legal status–not a path to citizenship–to young people who have been here for years already.

To get a two-year, renewable work permit, you had to:

-come to the United States under the age of sixteen;

-continuously reside here for a least five years;

-currently be in school, have graduated from high school, obtained a general education development certificate, or be an honorably discharged veteran of the armed forces;

-never been convicted of a felony offense, a significant misdemeanor offense, multiple misdemeanor offenses, or otherwise poses a threat to national security or public safety; and

-not be above the age of thirty.

White House officials estimate that the new policy will cover 800,000 undocumented workers, but no one knows how many will step up and reveal themselves as such.  It’s tempting to overestimate take-up but we’ll have to see.

But this just makes a lot of sense.  To achieve legal status is good for the workers–who then don’t have to hide in the shadows and can enjoy the protections of labor standards like minimum wages, overtime, worker safety rules.  And it’s good for employers, who can employ them without breaking the law.  Just the other day, I was talking to a restaurant owner–a great guy and a job creator!–who was all tied up in knots about this issue.

I like what Homeland Security Sec’y Janet Napolitano said about our immigration rules in this context–we should, of course, enforce them:

But they are not designed to be blindly enforced without consideration given to the individual circumstances of each case. Nor are they designed to remove productive young people to countries where they may not have lived or even speak the language. Discretion, which is used in so many other areas, is especially justified here.

One further thing.  I don’t totally get how the President can do this through executive memorandum–avoiding that gridlock factory known as the Congress.  I’m sure they’ll be lots of ink on that in coming days.  But good for him.  I heard John Boehner’s spokesman on MSNBC this AM saying he should have gone through Congress.  Hah!  That’s like Lucy castigating Charlie Brown for getting someone else to hold the football.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

5 comments in reply to "President Obama’s New Anti-Deportation Plan"

  1. Larry Signor says:

    I believe I see The President I voted for 3 1/2 years ago becoming what we and he always wanted him to be.

  2. Nhon Tran says:

    Jared – thank you. I agree that this initiative is good policy.
    My comment is in relation to your first sentence of 2nd para, that said,”Key to immigration reform is controlling inflows from the border.” In my view, border security is an easy way to frame the immigration debate because of its visual impact.
    But it is the wrong focus. For America (and Australia), successful immigration reform must mean more immigration, of both skilled and unskilled people, and for that to happen, and to defuse the immigration debate, policy makers must have a strong economy and employment prospect. Regards.

  3. save_the_rustbelt says:

    Obama just solidified the GOP base for Romney. Any skeptics are now Romney supporters.

    The federal government blindly enforces laws all of the time, on “crimes” ranging from small amounts of pot to unintentionally moving dirt or debris on a wetland (Obama’s EPA is going regulatory nuts).

    Jared, liberals do not like to talk about one topic – illegals taking jobs from African-Americans in urban areas. Those of us involved with business and front line labor markets knows it happens, but it is a collision of two political correctness issues.

    • save_the_rustbelt says:

      I’m in favor a of a very generous program for anyone serving and finishing a tour in the military, including citizenship for soldieer and spouse, children, and say ten “passes” for any immigrant of their choosing.

    • NRG says:

      The Republican base is divided on immigration, and the plan Obama has adopted is very similar to that proposed by Marco Rubio. How in the world does his adoption of a Rubio-like plan solidify the GOP base? I would argue quite the opposite — that it divides the base.

      As for the divide and conquer strategy you’re suggesting in regards to poverty-level urban jobs, we don’t focus on that for a reason. It’s largely irrelevant which demographic group holds them, and we focus instead on helping out anyone in that position. Thus we push for increases in the minimum wage, worker protections, and collective bargaining rights for all workers, worrying a lot less than you seem to about the color of their skin.