Solid jobs report will likely lead the Fed to raise next month…but what about after that?

November 6th, 2015 at 9:27 am

The nation’s employers added 271,000 jobs in October, and the unemployment rate ticked down slightly to 5% in a solid report on labor market conditions. Wages grew 2.5% over the past year, their strongest yearly performance since the recession officially ended in June 2009.

Today’s report portrayed a very different job market than that seen in the September release, when payrolls were up a by only (a revised) 137,000. As I stressed last month (“a weak report, but does it represent a true downshift?”), this sort of volatility is to be expected in “high-frequency” data and it is a strong reminder not to over-weight any one month’s data when forming your views of the job market.

Better to average monthly payroll gains as seen in my monthly smoother below. Over the past three months, payrolls were up 187,000 on average, compared to 235,000 over the past year. That suggests a mild deceleration of job growth but I consider anything above 150K to be solid employment growth meaning enough jobs per month to put legitimate downward pressure on the jobless rate.

Source: BLS, my calculations.

Source: BLS, my calculations.

Other positive signs in today’s report include:

–A decline in the number of involuntary part-time workers, down 1.2 million over the past year.

–We finally may be seeing some wage acceleration, and if it sticks, that would be a very big story. I already noted the annual 2.5% growth rate, but I also averaged hourly wages over the past three months and the three months before that, creating pseudo quarterly wage values (as opposed to calendar quarters). Annualized, wage growth is up 2.7% over the past three months, compared to 2.1% over the prior “quarter.”

–Outside of manufacturing and mining, which remain weakened by cheap oil and the strong dollar, most industries added jobs, with strong showings in construction, business services, health care, retail trade, and bars and restaurants. The latter two industry gains may reflect a broader swath of consumers flexing their spending muscles given stronger nominal wage growth amidst very low inflation.

Less positive signs include:

–As mentioned, factory employment is being hurt by the strong dollar which makes our exported goods less competitive. The sector was flat last month, and is down 28,000 jobs over the past three months.

–The labor force participation rate—the share of the working-age population either working or looking for work—remains historically low and was unchanged last month. Based on an aging/retiring labor force, no one should expect the LFPR to regain previous heights, but at least one of the 3.6 percentage points decline from its peak of 66% might be regained if labor demand remains strong, especially if job quality (i.e., compensation) improves as well, pulling more potential workers in off the sidelines.

Which brings us to the Federal Reserve. According to Chair Janet Yellen, before today’s report, the Fed was already considering raising their target interest rate slightly in their December meeting—she called the Dec. liftoff a “live possibility” but added they’ve “made no decision about it.”

Today’s report is likely to push them over the edge. Clearly the markets expect a Dec. rate increase as short-term Treasury yields this AM spiked to the highest levels in 5 years, as bond traders are trying to get ahead of the expected Fed rate bump.

You might well ask: “why should a jobs report be a deciding factor when inflation is so consistently below the Fed’s 2% target?” Good question. The liftoff advocates would say they’ve got to see around corners and the tightening job market may now be giving rise to wage pressures that will soon thereafter show up as price pressures.

But there’s a lot of links in that chain, and [trigger warning—life lesson from aged person follows!] I’ve learned to distrust economic arguments with a lot of steps. There’s many a slip between those linkages. For example, wage growth does not appear to be bleeding over into price growth as it has in the past.

Also, unless the Fed allows the job market to heat up and stay hot, the benefits of growth won’t reach significant swaths of the workforce who depend on lasting full employment to boost their sorely diminished bargaining clout. And remember, 2% inflation isn’t a ceiling; it’s an average, so having been below it for so long we’ve got room to rise above it for a while.

If today’s numbers push the Fed to raise slightly, so be it; 25 basis points (a quarter of a percent) shouldn’t make much of a difference to the macroeconomy, and we could finally be done with the “will-they-won’t they?” game.

But the important discussion now turns to the pace of their “normalization” campaign. Once again, the critical factor here is to remember that a few months of decent average wage growth at freakishly low inflation does not make up for decades of inequality, wage stagnation, and the persistent, growing split between productivity growth and median compensation.

So go ahead and tap the brakes, if you must, Yellen and co., but this recovery, much like the last one, has yet to lift the poor and middle class. Please give it a chance to do so.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

4 comments in reply to "Solid jobs report will likely lead the Fed to raise next month…but what about after that?"

  1. Ethosopher says:

    I believe it is fine to raise rates a bit. You and Dean have identified the major cause of our long term desent into slow growth. Fed rates can’t fix it.

    I’d like to hear Sanders call for a new trade paradigm that makes clear the supply-side, demand bleeding policies we have today. He’s against the TPP, but he needs to be for something better. We need a proactive plan for neutral trade rather than supply-side trade.

  2. Larry Signor says:

    Perhaps we don’t need to see around corners for an explanation for the increase in employment. The holiday season is upon US and historically (an old guy term) we usually see an uptick in employment this time of the season. But, January, February and March are around the corner, with an historical (OGT) relapse in employment to the mean. Seasonal adjustments are just that, seasonal adjustments. Right now I see good news as fly poop on my monitor screen. A little Windex, and poof, we are back where we started. The problems created by a too strong dollar, insufficient demand and wealth and income inequality don’t seem to have been solved. What do results without an apparent solution imply? A Fed rate increase is just more hidden austerity to appease rich white guys.

  3. Smith says:

    This was written about elsewhere but, the years when employment was less than 5% and inflation averaged 2% or less? 1998, 1965, 1956. That’s with an average of 2%, not a ceiling of 2%. Also 1998 came on the heals of a historic drop in oil prices. Our economy also presently is benefitting from a dramatic drop in oil last year, meaning the fundamentals are actually weaker, since we have a stimulus from money not used to pay for oil.

    The historical record indicates 2% inflation and full employment is nearly impossible, occurring 3 times in last 50 years, (for those inclined, in percentage that’s 6 out of 100 or 6%).

    You could dumb down full employment to mean 5% unemployment, with it’s low inflation, stagnant wages, weak demand, and rising inequality, but count me out of that group.

    • Smith says:

      Oops, first sentence was referring to unemployment of less than 5% obviously, not employment.
      Should read:
      “This was written about elsewhere but, the years when unemployment was less than 5% and inflation averaged 2% or less?”